lady_kishiria: (Default)
ancientjaguar ([personal profile] lady_kishiria) wrote2008-05-15 12:29 pm

Cinchntouch, I expect a wedding invite!

The California Supreme Court just gave the green light to same-sex marriages in this state:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24649689/

(Caveat: I do not believe in government overseeing marriages. Nonetheless, since the possibility of government pulling out of the marriage business seems highly unlikely, wrap this one up, I'll take it.)

Sometimes I'm asked why I am for same sex marriage in a state that has domestic partnerships. My answer is that if you have a MARRIAGE you know what to expect. Domestic partnerships are not the same thing as civil unions are not the same thing as marriage. If you are married you know you have to go to divorce court when the marriage ends. If you're in a domestic partnership you do as well, but it's not obvious from the name.

[identity profile] soldiergrrrl.livejournal.com 2008-05-15 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
So, how would contract law deal with that?

I'm just wondering how much law would have to be re-written to deal with incorporation rather than family law?
ext_267866: (Default)

[identity profile] buddykat.livejournal.com 2008-05-15 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, the way the pension laws are written, if you're not married, your partner will most likely get screwed. IANAL, but AFAIK, there's no way that contract law *could* deal with ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) and PPA (Pension Protection Act) regulations to get around the marriage requirement.