(no subject)
Jan. 15th, 2006 05:19 pmAhmadinejad just wants to make things better and better, doesn't he?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/01/15/iran-holocaust-060115.html
Word to Iran: You better recall this jerkoff and fast. You were doing so well with the secularization and your inhouse pseudo-McDonalds. Don't ruin all that NOW!
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/01/15/iran-holocaust-060115.html
Word to Iran: You better recall this jerkoff and fast. You were doing so well with the secularization and your inhouse pseudo-McDonalds. Don't ruin all that NOW!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 02:49 am (UTC)Don't get me wrong. I don't like the guy. I rather have gotten Rafsanjani, but I also would've rather gotten John Kerry. He's got as much chance of getting impeached or recalled as the Chimp did after 9/11.
Hey, look Michelle Bachelet of the Socialist Party just got elected as President of Chile.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 03:31 am (UTC)From my friends that have come back from Iraq it seems we are already fighting far too many Iranians as they jump the boarder to fight the great Satan.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 03:54 am (UTC)If you've been reading my LJ for any length you'll know I'm no Bush fan.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 04:49 am (UTC)As much as I like Russia they need to get the hell out of that country and stop helping them out with their nuclear and other military desires. They need to get their "advisers" and contractors out of there.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 05:33 am (UTC)Don't let Iran play you for fools. Anything they get involved with that has to do with Iraq is for purely self-serving reasons. They don't dole out explosives or send fighters across the border because they're doing an "All For Allah" solidarity cause; they're doing it because as long as someone else is sitting in Iraq, Iran can't roll over the weakened border and massacre Arabs to their little Persian hearts' content.
Rafsanjani's failed election campaign wasn't because he was a secularist and because the Coalition had rolled over Iraq; he didn't get elected because he opposed a mullah-backed and proposed reprisal system that would turn Iraq into an Iranian thralldom headed up by militant Shiites to get the revenge that the UN cheated them out of after the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, where Iraq was the aggressor, got beaten back across the border in 1982, and then Iran struggled for six years to topple Saddam Hussein's government as revenge and didn't succeed. The irony of that scenario was that it was the US who didn't want Iran to win that fight, and most assuredly the Iranians remember that; now it's the US who ousted Saddam, but we're not about to just take our hands off knowing full well that Iraq hasn't got enough left in it to withstand a vengeance-blitz from Iran. Iraq used tabun nerve agent in the Iran-Iraq War; guarantee that Iran will use that as a justification for unspeakable cruelty because no one bothered hitting Iraq with repercussions at the time (Khomeini was despised throughout the world so it was casually ignored by the UN until 1991, when it was finally condemned in resolution 620(1988)).
That knife was sharpened five administrations ago. Trying to pin Iran's turn away from secularism solely on Bush is the height of ignorance.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 09:17 am (UTC)I think, at both of their bases, is a belief in a "golden age" that never existed, and a response to the "future shock" of today's rapid rate of change.
ttyl
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 03:56 pm (UTC)But yes, when the US President starts talking about how a president MUST be Christian and that pagan soldiers shouldn't even exist, we should all be scared. This is not right and not what America was meant to be about.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-16 04:11 pm (UTC)