Blog for Choice Day!
Jan. 22nd, 2007 09:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I didn't know there was such a thing, but there is, so I'll get this done before midnight.
You often hear women say, "Well, I'd never have an abortion, but I support the right of any other woman to do it." That's not me. I can think of any number of reasons why I might have an abortion, and so I am pro-choice.
I want to see RU-486 brought into this country. It seems to me that pro-liars don't want it because they won't be able to wave their bloody fetus photos around since it induces abortions at a stage where the embryo is microscopic. You have to realize, I support legal abortion even MORE than I support it because I can't stand the pro-life crowd.
I've said that I do yearn for a day when abortion is no more. Seriously, I do. That would mean all contraception worked, that there was no rape and that all women were prosperous enough so that an unplanned pregnancy wouldn't be a big deal. That sounds good, doesn't it? When I pray for an end to abortion, that's what I mean. I don't think pro-liars mean the same thing.
You often hear women say, "Well, I'd never have an abortion, but I support the right of any other woman to do it." That's not me. I can think of any number of reasons why I might have an abortion, and so I am pro-choice.
I want to see RU-486 brought into this country. It seems to me that pro-liars don't want it because they won't be able to wave their bloody fetus photos around since it induces abortions at a stage where the embryo is microscopic. You have to realize, I support legal abortion even MORE than I support it because I can't stand the pro-life crowd.
I've said that I do yearn for a day when abortion is no more. Seriously, I do. That would mean all contraception worked, that there was no rape and that all women were prosperous enough so that an unplanned pregnancy wouldn't be a big deal. That sounds good, doesn't it? When I pray for an end to abortion, that's what I mean. I don't think pro-liars mean the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 05:28 am (UTC)What irks me is that mifepristone has been shown to be a highly effective medication against breast cancer, but the freakish "pro-lifers" here have done everything in their power to make sure no studies can be done--because it's an "abortion drug". That is just another thing to convince me that they have no interest in womens' well-being at all, but are only out to control their bodies.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 07:18 am (UTC)Anti-Sex Leagueabstinence-only crowd has been pushing about the HPV and it's root in the cause of cervical cancer, especially in light that there's now a vacine for it.no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 01:38 pm (UTC)Because it's not about health, it's about punishing us for having sex, and enjoying it, and not having to suffer consequences.
I couldn't believe they were trying to pull the "the vaccine will encourage them to have sex" bit. As we all know, only the dread fear of HPV is keeping untold numbers of teenage girls and women from having sex.
Right. With what passes for sex ed these days, how many girls or guys even know what HPV is?
DV
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 07:05 am (UTC)And then, there's the contradiction in capital punishment and war.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 07:15 am (UTC)After all, the abortion issue is very much a control issue, not only over women, who've gained in power in the past 30-40 years, but also minorities: one doesn't have to go far to hear a pundit like Bill Bennett mouth off saying that crime would go down if more blacks had abortions or some Fox News tool say that white women need to breed more white babies.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 08:51 am (UTC)See this Sunday's NY Times magazine for a profile on one of these activists. It's pretty interesting.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 01:35 pm (UTC)As opposed to the potential harm caused by having to carry a pregnancy you didn't want to term and then having to either go through the adoption process or raise the child.
Right.
I call BS on this one.
DV
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 12:45 am (UTC)First of all, there are those (and I love the new pronounciation, pro-liars) who consider contraception to be EXACTLY the same as abortion. Gee, thanks a lot. So, if you're having sex with a man, you get to worry. Count. Take your temperature. Yadda, yadda, yadda.
And, then, what really gets me boiling. So, the abstinence campaign fails, the girl gets pregnant - and what is the advice? Well, the most noble sacrifice: carry the fetus to term, so you can provide a baby for an intertile couple. Yup, baby-breeding promoted. Ugh.
Anyway, just my three cents' worth.
H.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 03:09 am (UTC)I celebrate that, and say it should not be mandatory.
Women are ALWAYS told to sacrifice. Fuck that, let someone else give something up!