lady_kishiria: (Default)
I've been getting asked about the Da Vinci Code lately, so I decided to link to an entry I wrote a couple of years ago about it:

http://tepintzin.livejournal.com/82966.html

I said then it's a sexist book and even in [community profile] catholicism they've been saying that.

I also want to mention that the Priory of Sion was a hoax of Pierre Plantard's. He started it in the postwar years as a French monarchist revival group. When it got hijacked by Baignent et Cie to show he was rightfully king of France due to his being a descendant of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, he copped to the truth since he was a devout Catholic who couldn't stomach *that* idea.

I saw part of the movie yesterday and it's AWFUL. If I hadn't read both the book DVC and "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" I'd have had no idea what was going on. I enjoyed the book for what it was, groaning loudly at al the historical stupidities (which were plagiarized anyway), and admit it'd make a good thriller done right but it wasn't done right.
lady_kishiria: (Default)
So, I just finished reading "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown. I don't want to give away too much, but it's largely about the Priory of Sion, revival of the goddess, and Mary Magdalene, the same subject matter as "Holy Blood, Holy Grail". As everybody knows ad infinitum, I'm a feminist theologian and Virgin Mary expert. (This is why I work a crappy non-related job.)

As I was reading, something started to annoy me. It took me a while to figure out what it was. Finally, it hit me. Consider this paragraph:

"The ability of the woman to produce life from her womb made her sacred. A god. Intercourse was the revered union of the two halves of the human spirit--male and female--through which the male could find spiritual wholeness and communion with God...The Hieros Gamos ritual is not a perversion. It's a deeply sacrosanct ceremony."

The idea is that Mary Magdalene, mother of Jesus's children, is in a way unclear to me a prophet of the goddess.

Okay, now am I the only one who is bothered by "divine feminine as fertility"? Cause I am bothered by it a LOT. I have no children, probably never will. This concept of the divine feminine doesn't speak to me at all. Also, I know a lot of you reading are queer in some description. This whole thing smacks of divinely-mandated heterosexuality as well. Finally, how nice to know that women are the means to a MAN'S enlightenment. All we have to do is fuck them and they see God. Yay.

Sister Elizabeth Johnson in her book "She Who Is" proposes a good theory for the "divine feminine" by the way. She says that since all mens' patriarchal experience is assimilated to God (fatherhood, soldiering, rulership, to name a few) that womens' experiences need to be assimilated to God as well. Motherhood is part of that, but she proposes that if it is part of womens' experience, it needs to be studied to see how it can be shown to reveal God. She suggests that images and language about the Virgin Mary, who is queen, healer, mother, virgin, widow, and prophet, be mined for images of God. Johson points out that that's only the tip of the iceberg, as such images as sister and friend are not applied to God much yet, and I observe that lesbians have their work cut out for them.

Just say no to dualism! (Rosemary Radford Ruether is a source for the evils of that.)

Profile

lady_kishiria: (Default)
ancientjaguar

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 20 21 22232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 05:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios